-1.7Very low
Financial Post publishes misleading opinion that misrepresents science of polar bears’ plight
“The article is composed of misstatements. These are either based upon the author’s apparent lack of understanding of the ecological and geophysical situations, or intent to mislead readers.”
0.3Neutral
National Geographic video of starving polar bear should have clarified uncertain link to climate change
“The article contains valid information on the devastating consequences of climate change on polar bears. The only problem as I see it is that the article presents (implicitly) that the polar bear in the video is dying as a consequence of climate change and from not finding enough food due to lack of sea ice…”