Latest in

Press coverage

    • Current Affairs
    Posted on: 

    Teaching Climate Change – The best way to teach someone about science is by encouraging them to doubt it…

    “Recently, a conservative think tank called the Heartland Institute sent an elaborate booklet called “Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming” to schoolteachers all over the country. Some have worried that, since it is a piece of “unscientific propaganda” containing false claims about climate science, it will “mislead tens of thousands of students.” But the scientists at Climate Feedback, a nonpartisan institution that evaluates claims about climate science in the media, had a different perspective. While giving the Heartland Institute’s report an “F” for accuracy, and thoroughly debunking its various claims, they didn’t simply tell teachers to throw the document away and forget it showed up. Instead, they said, “this book provides an opportunity for science teachers to teach their students about fallacious reasoning, as well as common misconceptions about climate science and the deceptive talking points that today floods their social media feeds.””

    Read the article
    • Sierra Club National Magazine
    Posted on: 

    Fear Factor: A Defense of NEW YORK's Climate Doom Cover Story

    Let’s get some unpleasantries out of the way: Wallace-Wells’s story isn’t without its faults. In a lengthy discussion at Climate Feedback, a group of 17 scientists have identified what they say are inaccuracies in the piece. […] And yet, as one scientist involved in the Climate Feedback dialogue, UCLA post-doc Daniel Swain, points out, “It is quantitatively true—and often underappreciated—that the likelihood of a ‘worse than expected’ climate future is actually higher than a ‘better than expected’ one.”

    Read the article
    • The Boston Globe
    Posted on: 

    Blanket claim that climate models are flawed dismisses their key role

    Following Climate Feedback’s analysis, The Boston Globe invited us to write a short letter to the editor responding to Jacoby’s column.
    “As The Boston Globe’s Twitter account claims, #FactsMatter. To gain correct scientific understanding of how the world works, sound logic is also required.”

    Read the article
    • The Guardian
    Posted on: 

    This is why conservative media outlets like the Daily Mail are ‘unreliable’

    “This past November, Rose tried to blame the record-shattering hot global temperatures of 2016 on El Niño in a piece that the climate scientists at “Climate Feedback gave a “very low” scientific credibility score of -1.9. The lowest possible score is -2.0. The scientists described Rose’s article as “incredibly misleading,” “flawed to perfection,” “deceptive,” and “completely bogus.” One expressed dismay that they couldn’t rate its credibility worse than “very low.””

    Read the article
    • Computer World
    Posted on: 

    Why fake news is a tech problem

    “The beauty of this approach is that each article is judged independently (instead of branding an entire publication as “bad”). […] Better still, the site essentially teaches media criticism and skepticism from a scientific point of view.”

    Read the article