Scientific studies established clear links between human-caused increased in atmospheric CO2 and global warming

These claims appeared in a video featuring Patrick Moore, an industry consultant, which has received more than 13,000 views since it was published on Instagram in December 2020. Contrary to what is claimed, the scientific evidence clearly demonstrates a causal link between atmospheric CO₂ concentrations and global warming^[1-4]. Furthermore, although carbon dioxide can increase plant growth in some environments, it can also negatively impact natural ecosystems and human societies by causing global warming, imbalancing the carbon cycle, and driving weather extremes^[1,4,5]. 

Pre-industrialization atmospheric CO₂ levels were around 280 parts per million (ppm)^[1]. Since 1950, the burning of fossil fuels, agricultural development, and other human-caused land-use changes have led to steady increases in atmospheric CO₂. Today, atmospheric CO₂ exceeds 400 ppm (see figure below). 

Figure—The Keeling Curve, a daily record of global atmospheric CO₂, shows relatively stable CO₂ concentrations from 1700 to 1950, as measured by ice-cores. After 1950, CO₂ concentrations rose rapidly from 300 to over 400 ppm, as measured at the Mauna Loa Observatory. From Scripps Institute of Oceanography.

Alongside these increases in atmospheric CO₂, global land and ocean temperatures have steadily increased (see figure below). 

Figure—Global temperature anomaly data relative to the 20^th century average temperature from the Global Historical Climatology Network-Monthly data set and International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set. These data sets show consistent global warming trends. From NOAA.

As stated in a 2014 IPCC report, “Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have increased since the pre-industrial era, driven largely by economic and population growth, and are now higher than ever. This has led to atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide that are unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. Their effects, together with those of other anthropogenic drivers, have been detected throughout the climate system and are extremely likely to have been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.”^[1]

And the 2017 US National Climate Assessment states, “This assessment concludes, based on extensive evidence, that it is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century. For the warming over the last century, there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence.”^[6]

An analysis of the factors that influence global surface temperatures found that anthropogenic increases in greenhouse gas emissions account for more than 100% of the warming trends observed since 1850 (see figure below).

Figure—The estimated role of different factors influencing global surface temperatures from 1850 to 2017. Observed temperatures are shown in black dots. Global warming over the past 150 years was primarily driven by greenhouse gas emissions (red). From Carbon Brief.

While increased levels of CO₂ have increased plant growth in some regions of the world, these effects also decrease with increasing CO₂ concentrations^[7]. In addition to CO₂, plants require water and other nutrients to grow. Scientific studies show the effects of CO₂ on plant growth depend on the availability of other nutrients, such as phosphorus and nitrogen^[8]. The plant growth benefits of CO₂ can also be outweighed by negative climate impacts, such as increasing water stress, heat stress, and ocean acidification^[9,10]. In order to assess the overall impact of CO₂ on the planet, all known effects of CO₂ on land ecosystems and human societies should be evaluated together.

[Comment from a previous evaluation of a similar claim.] 

First, greenhouse gases are well studied, and their properties are nonnegotiable: They absorb and re-emit longwave radiation, whether they’re in a laboratory setting or in the real atmosphere. To back this up with historical evidence, scientists have known since the 1860s that CO₂ is a greenhouse gas and since the 1890s that this will affect the heat budget of the Earth through warming. Even then, these claims were based on empirical evidence, and they’re supported by decades of laboratory research.

Second, the link between increased greenhouse gas concentrations and warming continues to be supported by research in the last two decades. One study from 2001 used satellites to measure the type of energy entering and exiting Earth’s atmosphere and concluded that increases in greenhouse gases were responsible for extra heat measured between 1970 and 1997^[11]. The authors state that their results “provide direct experimental evidence for a significant increase in the Earth’s greenhouse effect that is consistent with concerns over radiative forcing of climate.” (Here, the term “radiative forcing” refers to the extra energy trapped in the atmosphere by greenhouse gases, cause warming.) A more recent study arrived at similar conclusions, confirming predictions of the greenhouse effect in Earth’s atmosphere and providing “empirical evidence of how rising CO₂ levels … are affecting the surface energy balance.”^[3] In other words, rising CO₂ was linked directly to warming, even when things like plant uptake of CO₂ were considered.

[Comment from a previous evaluation of a similar claim.] 

The primary empirical evidence that greenhouse gasses cause global warming is the absorption (as a function of wavelength of radiation) of gasses like CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O. This was discovered in 1859 by John Tyndall and has become a part of fundamental physics. Anyone can check this empirical relationship at any time with an absorption spectroscopy device.

The empirical evidence that increases in greenhouse gas concentrations (from fossil fuel burning) are the primary cause of century-scale warming is that observed global temperatures have risen in line with what would be expected from the observed increase in greenhouse gas concentrations and observations of natural drivers of climate change (e.g. solar output and volcanic eruptions) indicate that natural drivers are not causing warming.

[Comment from a previous evaluation of a similar claim.] 

This is the usual misleading argument that if CO₂ is good for plants, it cannot be bad for the climate. CO₂ is needed for plant growth (along with water, nutrients, and energy from the sun)—but it does not change the fact that CO₂ is a greenhouse gas. It increases the radiative forcing of the planet and leads to warming, as observed over the last century^[5].

[Comment from a previous evaluation of a similar claim.] 

CO₂ is indeed fundamental for most life on Earth. Plants need CO₂ to grow and they are at the base of the food chain. However, this fact is often abused to claim that increasing CO2 concentrations is mainly a good thing. Although plant growth is often stimulated by increasing CO₂ concentrations, CO₂ also causes ocean acidification and warms the planet, thereby generating a cascade of effects from melting of glaciers and sea level rise to altered precipitation patterns and increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heatwaves and droughts^[1,9,10]. These in turn threaten water and food supplies, and as climate change progresses, this is also likely to undo much of the beneficial effect that CO₂ has on plant growth^[10].

REFERENCES:

• 1 – IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
• 2 – Shakun et al. (2012) Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation. Nature.
• 3 – Feldman et a. (2015) Observational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010. Nature. 
• 4 – Friedlingstein et al (2019) Global carbon budget 2019. Earth System Science Data.  
• 5- Zhu et al. (2016) Greening of the Earth and its drivers. Nature Climate Change.
• 6 – Wuebbles et al. (2017) Executive summary. In: Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume I.
• 7- Moore et al. (2017) New science of climate change impacts on agriculture implies higher social cost of carbon. Nature.
• 8- De Graaff et al. (2006) Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO₂: a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology.
• 9 – Doney et al (2009) Ocean acidification: The other CO_2> problem. Annual Review of Marine Science.
• 10 – Mbow et al. (2019)  IP Food Security. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. IPCC report.
• 11 – Harries et al. (2001) Increases in greenhouse forcing inferred from the outgoing longwave radiation spectra of the Earth in 1970 and 1997. Nature.