Animal studies included in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine approval application showed no signs of reproductive toxicity
Claim:
“COVID Vaccines Were Never Safe for Pregnant Women, Pfizer’s own data show”
Claim:
“COVID Vaccines Were Never Safe for Pregnant Women, Pfizer’s own data show”
Claim:
“There is a huge boom in cancer, especially in female breast cancer in the younger ages of 45 and below.”
Claim:
“Major New Autopsy Report Reveals Those Who Died Suddenly Were Likely Killed by the Covid Vaccine”
…famine: for instance, inadequate planning, social upheaval, economic struggles, conflicts with other groups, etc.[19]. Past scholarship has focused a lot on the collapse of societies; however, recent scholarship has discovered…
…of evidence. Rather, scientists have focused on a number of different shortcomings of instrumental-based equilibrium climate sensitivity estimates. These include using different surface temperature fields (e.g. models use air over…
…than it is perhaps a bit misleading, since DeConto & Pollard is only focused on the contribution from the Antarctic Ice Sheet. As DeConto & Pollard say in their study:…
…fact that past logging focused on larger diameter trees, which are more profitable, rather than the removal of small diameter trees. Removing small diameter trees while leaving large diameter mature…
Claim:
“the mRNA jab didn’t actually save any lives”
Claim:
A study by Kaiser Permanente “shows negative efficacy of the shots against all variants within 150 days”; “the more you inject, the more you infect”