Science shows that humans are primarily responsible for climate change, counter to EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s claim
Claim:
I would not agree that [carbon dioxide is] a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.
Claim:
I would not agree that [carbon dioxide is] a primary contributor to the global warming that we see.
Claim:
“Electric Cars Emit More Particulate Pollution”; Banning gasoline cars could increase particulate emissions
… REVIEWERS’ OVERALL FEEDBACK These comments are the overall assessment of scientists on the article, they are substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the…
…overall opinion of scientists on the article, they are substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the analysis in the annotations on the article. Marina…
…substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the analysis in the annotations on the article. Tim Woollings Lecturer, University of Oxford The article seems to…
…they are substantiated by their knowledge in the field and by the content of the analysis in the annotations on the article. The Washington Post article refers to an article…
Claim:
“Autism is nothing more than mercury toxicity“; vaccine ingredients are toxic
Claim:
“Trees provide a solution to almost all environmental crises we're facing. Trees reverse climate change by cleaning carbon from the air.”
Claim:
“Forest fires are caused by poor management. Not by climate change.”
Claim:
Fifty-five thousand years ago the whole world was 2°C warmer than it is today[...] It's all cyclical; [human-caused greenhouse gas emissions are] not a fart in the wind. Sea level rise is not going to happen.