![](https://science.feedback.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/patrick-tomasso-Oaqk7qqNh_c-unsplash-scaled.jpg)
Boston Globe column claims that climate models have consistently failed based on no evidence
Claim:
Climate projections using models based on it [the water vapor feedback] have consistently failed
Articles tagged with
Claim:
Climate projections using models based on it [the water vapor feedback] have consistently failed
“The facts given by the author regarding the skills of climate models and the state of the art are mostly wrong. The most important processes are not understood by the author and his logic is flawed.”
Claim:
the warming is not nearly as great as the climate change computer models have predicted.
“Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence, and Lovelock has not even come up to the standards of providing what the scientific community would consider to be ordinary evidence. The journalist did not balance Lovelock’s statements with a set of clear statements saying that the vast majority of informed climate scientists (as, for example, represented by the IPCC reports) have reached consensus on conclusions that are diametrically opposed to what Lovelock is saying, and that the IPCC scientists have backed up their statements with a wealth of empirical data, whereas Lovelock is largely opining without providing any substantive evidence to support his rather extraordinary claims.”